Tobacco Facts.

The 17 senators who voted against allowing the Food and Drug Administration to regulate tobacco included some of the top recipients of campaign contributions from tobacco manufacturers.

Georgia Sen. Saxby Chambliss is the third highest recipient of the group.

The historic anti-smoking legislation that the Senate passed Thursday sped to final congressional passage on Friday. Lawmakers and the White House quickly declared that it would save the lives of thousands of smokers of all ages. Even more important, they said, the measure could keep countless young people from starting in the first place.

Specifically, the measure for the first time will give the Food and Drug Administration authority to regulate what goes into tobacco products, demand changes or elimination of toxic substances and block the introduction of new products.

The Senate passed the FDA bill on Thursday by a 79-17 vote and the House followed suit on Friday, with a 307-97 vote.

Tobacco contributions

Over the course of his more than 20-year career in the Senate, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Republican from the tobacco-rich state of Kentucky, has received $419,025 from the tobacco industry — more than any other member of Congress, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan nonprofit organization that analyzes the influence of money on politics and policy.

North Carolina Republican Sen. Richard Burr, who led the opposition to the bill, is the second highest recipient. Burr netted $359,100 from tobacco-related political action committees and individual contributions. His state is the nation’s largest tobacco grower and is home to R.J. Reynolds, the nation’s second largest tobacco manufacturing company, which contributed $196,850 to Burr’s campaigns.

Chambliss, the ranking Republican on the Senate Agriculture Committee, received $228,700. Kentucky Republicans Rep. Ed Whitfield and Sen. Jim Bunning rank fifth and eighth, with $218,935 and $194,166, respectively.

All oppose giving additional tobacco regulatory duties to the FDA, an agency they said they think does not have adequate resources for the task. The senators say cigarette companies’ campaign contributions did not color positions on the legislation.

“I voted against the FDA tobacco bill because I’m opposed to the overregulation of an industry that’s already highly regulated, from farmer to manufacturer,” Chambliss said. “The bill saddles the already overburdened FDA with even more oversight duties, and does nothing to reduce the rate of smoking among Americans — cigarettes already on the shelves will remain on the market.”

Bunning, whose campaigns received $42,500 from R.J. Reynolds, says his vote reflects his state’s interests. According to 2007 figures from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Kentucky ranks second in overall tobacco exports, and the crop pumps $386.4 million into the state’s economy.

Related posts:

1. Senate votes to regulate tobacco The federal government would have broad new authority to regulate...
2. Tobacco funds recipient When Sen. Richard Burr, R-N.C., stepped forward last week to...
3. Tobacco regulations are no regulations at all This week, the U.S. Senate is considering legislation that would,...
4. US Senate Panel Approves FDA Tobacco-Regulation Measure A bill giving the Food and Drug Administration power to...
5. Burr stands tall for tobacco Walk into U.S. Sen. Richard Burr’s office, and you’ll notice...
6. Burr stands tall for tobacco Walk into U.S. Sen. Richard Burr’s office, and you’ll notice...
7. Senator Gillibrand Votes 100% Against Tobacco In Congress, Senator Gillibrand stands up 100% of the time...
8. New regulation of tobacco products Like smoking, defending tobacco just isn’t cool anymore. Just ask...
9. FDA imposes regulations on electronic cigarettes Since Ohio’s statewide smoking ban went into effect in...
10. Senate give FDA control over tobacco products The Senate on Tuesday rejected the main challenge to legislation...