More research needed into safety of electronic cigarettes
The need for more research into the long-term health effects of 
electronic cigarettes has been highlighted by scientists in the British Medical Journal.
Andreas Flouris and Dimitris Oikonomou, from the Institute of Human Performance and Rehabilitation in Greece, are concerned that not enough research has been carried out into the safety - or otherwise - of so-called ‘e-cigarettes’.
Their position has been endorsed by Cancer Research UK, which is also concerned by the current lack of information.
E-cigarettes are battery-powered devices that simulate cigarettes by allowing the user to inhale a nicotine vapour.
Sales of the devices are thought to be increasing and a number of celebrities - including Kate Moss and Leonardo DiCaprio - have been spotted using them.
However, few studies have been conducted into the health effects of smoking e-cigarettes and those that have been published have reached differing conclusions.
One, carried out by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), found that the amount of nicotine provided with each puff often varies from the amount stated on the label, prompting the agency to express concern about e-cigarettes.
In contrast, a private enterprise called Health New Zealand (HNZ) found that the labelling on e-cigarettes reflected their actual nicotine content.
The FDA’s research also detected the presence of diethylene glycol - a highly toxic liquid - in one of the cartridges it investigated, while both the FDA and HNZ found cancer-causing chemicals called tobacco specific N-nitrosamines.
In its report, the FDA suggested that e-cigarettes may therefore be harmful, but HNZ recommended their use as they are likely to be less dangerous than tobacco products.
Meanwhile, a Greek organisation called Demokritos has maintained a neutral stance on the subject after conducting its own research.
Drs Flouris and Oikonomou note that this “represents all the knowledge we currently have about e-cigarettes” and that the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control is yet to publish any research on the subject.
“Alternative smoking strategies aimed at reducing the threat to public health caused by the tobacco epidemic are always welcome,” the researchers conceded.
However, they observed: “To date, our knowledge about the acute and long-term effects of e-cigarette use is, at best, very limited.
“The scarce evidence indicates the existence of various toxic and carcinogenic compounds, albeit in possibly much smaller concentrations than in traditional cigarettes.”
Jean King, Cancer Research UK’s director of tobacco control, said: “There has been little research into how safe e-cigarettes are. And there’s also very little regulation to control these products or their marketing. The only way to be sure of any risks or benefits is through rigorous testing.
“Anyone trying to quit smoking should use medicinal nicotine products such as patches, gum or inhalators, because these have been tested and found to be safe and effective. We believe that e-cigarettes should undergo the same rigorous tests and meet the same standards as all other medicinal products containing nicotine.”
Reference: Flouris, A., & Oikonomou, D. (2010). Electronic cigarettes: miracle or menace? BMJ, 340
21 January 2010
Related posts:
- Fears raised about safety of electronic cigarettes The government is set to crack down on sales of...
- The business of electronic cigarettes Informa’s Regulatory Affairs Journal (RAJ) has published a feature on...
- Distributors of electronic cigarettes against FDA in Court Oregon has already issued a landmark ordinance to prohibit sales...
- FDA seeks elimination of electronic cigarettes from the US market After the Food and Drug Administration had been entitled to...
- Electronic Cigarette Association Urges Unbiased Evaluation of E-cigarettes WASHINGTON-As the debate heats up concerning the use of electronic...
- Analysis Finds Toxic Substances in Electronic Cigarettes Electronic cigarettes contain traces of toxic substances and carcinogens, according...
- Electronic cigarettes catch on with consumers John Wisniewski wonders whether electronic cigarettes will help him stop...
- Electronic cigarettes under fire for targeting Arizona kids PHOENIX - In a hidden camera investigation, the ABC15 Investigators...
- Electronic cigarettes and vaping Electronic cigarettes are battery powered drug delivery machines that allow...
There’s more than enough evidence to show that vaping is much less dangerous than smoking. Ecigs have been widely commercially available for over three years now with not one known major health problem.
There are lots of studies here - http://vapersnetwork.org/node/8
“Anyone trying to quit smoking should use medicinal nicotine products such as patches, gum or inhalators, because these have been tested and found to be safe and effective.” This mantra must be posted somewhere for convenient copy-and-paste by tobacco control people and public health experts. I’ll agree they are safe, but how effective are they? Answer: They double your chances of quitting cold turkey. Question: Oh, really? What are my chances of quitting cold turkey? Answer: 5%.
Smokers who switched to electronic cigarettes have already tried all the “medicinal nicotine” products. They were in the unlucky 90% for whom those products were ineffective. Question: How effective is the electronic cigarette? Answer: Surveys and polls show that >80% of regular users have completely replaced all their tobacco cigarettes.
Question: But aren’t they dangerous? Answer: What’s dangerous is continuing to smoke. Every day some irreversable damage is done to cells, the lungs, and to the heart and circulatory system. The FDA asked consumers to report adverse events to MedWatch last June. However the agency was unable to produce any evidence to the U.S. District court that anyone has been harmed by the electronic cigarettes.