Rivals pursue same goal: Reynolds American, Philip Morris prod FDA
Pursuing a reduced-risk niche for smokeless-tobacco products has put archrivals Reynolds American Inc. and Philip Morris USA on the same lobbying path.
It’s not likely that the manufacturers will collaborate on their goal — persuading the Food and Drug Administration to position smokeless tobacco as part of a middle ground between cigarettes and nicotine-cessation products, such as gum and patches.
Still, analysts said that having the top two U.S. cigarette companies pushing for regulatory changes may create more clout than either could get on its own.
“This is truly historic, as the largest tobacco companies are now advocating regulatory policies to reduce cigarette consumption, disease and death,” said Bill Godshall, the executive director of SmokeFree Pennsylvania.
In recent years, the manufacturers have bought their way into top marketplace positions in moist snuff — Reynolds with Conwood and Philip Morris with UST Inc. — as part of strategies for countering declining consumer demand for cigarettes.
Reynolds is considered the industry leader in innovative smokeless products.
Philip Morris’ decision adds an intriguing twist considering it was the lone major manufacturer to push for FDA regulation. Reynolds has pushed for a niche for smokeless tobacco for years.
“It is interesting that the tobacco company that supported federal regulation is now taking a similar view on this topic as we are,” said David Howard, a Reynolds spokesman.
The new stance irks the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, Philip Morris’ collaborator on FDA regulation. The group opposes promoting smokeless tobacco as an alternative to smoking.
“We supported the legislation because it’s a very strong law that will reduce tobacco use, so it’s not surprising that Philip Morris would try to undermine it,” said Danny McGoldrick, the vice president of research for the advocacy group.
“This is a ploy to weaken the strong scientific standard Congress adopted for health-related claims, which requires that manufacturers demonstrate that the product significantly reduces the risk of tobacco-related disease for individual users and benefits the health of the U.S. population as a whole.”
Anti-tobacco advocates say that smokeless products can serve as gateway products to smoking for youths, as well as keep smokers using one or both products when they might quit otherwise.
However, a February 2009 report representing 26 advocates and university researchers acknowledged for the first time that smokeless-tobacco products are an option for reducing health risks for tobacco users. Among the 26 advocates was the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids.
The two-year study, titled “The Strategic Dialogue on Tobacco Harm Reduction,” called for “policies that encourage current tobacco users to reduce their health risks by switching from the most to the least harmful nicotine-containing products.”
Philip Morris said in its letter to the FDA “a regulatory approach that forces cigarette smokers to choose between smoking, on the one hand, and not using tobacco at all, on the other, could have the consequence of preserving cigarette smoking as the dominant form of tobacco use in the United States.”
“A third approach is needed to complement proven prevention and cessation strategies, not to compete with them.”
Analysts said Reynolds could be hurt competitively if a niche is created for smokeless products because it would give Philip Morris incentive to put more resources into the category.
The biggest steps that Reynolds has taken in that direction involved buying Conwood for $3.5 billion in April 2006, and Niconovum AB, a Swedish company that specializes in smoking-cessation products, for $44.5 million in November.
“We believe investors are underestimating competitive threats to Reynolds in its smokeless business in 2010,” said Judy Hong, an analyst with Goldman Sachs. She recently downgraded her rating of Reynolds’ stock from “neutral” to “sell.”
“We admit Reynolds’ smokeless growth was solid in 2009. However, we are increasingly concerned that competitive activity from Altria is likely to continue to step up this year following a 2009 that we view largely as a transition year after its acquisition of UST.”
By Richard Craver
January 12, 2010
Related posts:
- Philip Morris Pushes Smokeless Tobacco giant Philip Morris USA Inc. is urging the Food...
- Philip Morris to challenge ban on display of tobacco products A County Donegal shopkeeper will join forces with cigarette manufacturer...
- Philip Morris International 3Q profit falls RICHMOND, Va. — Cigarette maker Philip Morris International Inc., which...
- Philip Morris USA drops lawsuit against San Francisco SAN FRANCISCO - The nation’s largest cigarette manufacturer has dropped...
- Reynolds promotes smoking cessation to raises tobacco sales Trying to buy a company that specializes in products that...
- Opposition to Manufacture and Sale of ‘American Blend’ Cigarettes RALEIGH, N.C., - North Carolina State Representatives Jerry Dockham and...
Recent Comments